![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
#3
By
wendyrose
on
13-10-06, 10:18 AM
|
|
great article, im so glad you mentions nno with gel, im glad im not the only one who has this problem, once iv done a full set with tips and they have been on for a while and the tip grows out i have no problem with nno, but if i do it on non enhanced nn they seems to chip at the free edge, not always but about 60% of the time, no matter how much i cap!
|
|
#4
By
Jeni Giles
on
14-10-06, 12:34 AM
|
|
After it is cured resin IS acrylic. Chemically speaking anything made from plastic or resin is in the acrylic family. Refer to Nail Structure and Product Chemistry by Dr. Doug Schoon, he has loads of info about how products are made!!
|
|
#6
By
VHunter
on
05-03-07, 02:51 PM
|
||
|
This is a great comparison!
My only questions, however regards this: For L&P Quote:
For UV Gel Quote:
BUT I did fiddle with my UV Gel when I received my package prior to attending to my course, for about 2wks. I have also fiddled with L&P since, on many occasions. I personally find L&P much harder, and haven't yet succeeded in doing anything worth looking at. Would application levels of difficulty (smile vs frown) not vary upon the user's opinion and personal experience, and not be across the board? I find making a ball a nightmare, trying to get the correct ratio. Granted, this will change once I take a course. BUT I always see threads about Liquid to powder ratio problems....and I assume that it is something that takes time to perfect. Particularly since even if you think things are going great for application, if you've the incorrect ratio, then you could have lifting problems etc... There is no such issue with uv gel, re: ratios. So, one might say that uv gel is easier than L&P, due to ratio? (only going on what I've read, so I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm wrong As for the strength of a natural overlay, could that not depend on the brand? I personally did not 'think' it chipped more often. I don't find that client's chip excessively. It does occasionally happen, but I wouldn't say on a regular basis. I see lift at the free edge, more often than I see chips. When it does happen (chipping) clients usually say they bashed it or whatever. And I'm not skilled with L&P to be able compare it myself, fairly. So of course, my experiences are limited to draw upon and perhaps my 'opinions' on the differences between are of course one sided , except for what I've been reading. Hence why I have all these questions. I do realize that L&P is 'harder' and uv gel is more 'flexible', therein lies the differences in their strength. But I have a couple of clients that have converted from L&P at their former tech to uv gel with myself, and they say that it happens less? That they have less breakages and chips. My thought was it was because it's (uv gel) is more flexible, so better for NNO's than L&P? I've enjoyed this article and find it a very interesting comparison of the systems, and very informative! I only wonder if some of it might depend more on personal experience and brand, rather than fact? |
||
|
#7
By
*Garfield*
on
05-03-07, 02:59 PM
|
|
This is great Geeg, really informative.
![]() |
|
#8
By
geeg
on
05-03-07, 03:15 PM
|
|
Without quoting the whole of vhuters post ...
If you read the opening statement it clearly states that the article is based on generic lines as naturally, more high end lines incorporate more highend technology and differ in strength, flexibility etc. |
|
Last edited by geeg; 24-06-07 at 04:28 PM..
|
|
#11
By
Sara Satchell
on
04-08-07, 05:09 PM
|
|
What an absolutley fantastic piece. I've been looking for this infor for 2 days now - this article contains all the answers I need and more!
Thanks Gigi |
![]() |
| Article Tools | |
|
|