I wonder if they really even know what's involved?
I do callus peel and it's never even occurred to me that it is anything other than part of a pedicure . . . what else could it be defined as under an insurance policy I wonder? It's not an invasive treatment like scalpelling the hard skin would be. I didn't even bother asking my insurance company when I started using callus peel in my pedicures as I assumed it was just another (very effective) product. Whatever next - if you decide to change the cream you use to massage the feet and legs with you then have to let your insurance company know, to see if it's on their approved list??
If insurance companies are going to start getting so picky over a treatment such as this I'm afraid it will start to discourage therapists from paying out for insurance altogether.
Sorry to rant, but really- how ridiculous.
I'll be interested to hear other opinions.