Right...for the sake of the mods and the people who DO want to discuss this topic, please can we all only post constructive posts on here.
If Ear Candles are not your thing for whatever reason...move onto another thread.
Thank You.
Just to draw a comparison, is that like supporting the use of 100 grits files for prep ? WE know it's wrong, we have the proof, the true professionals (or those that care) don't do it, yet some persist .....
Geeg mentions some things time and time again (the poor luv, repeating herself over and over), because it's what she believes in.
Yet I get bitched about and edited because I provide proof about Ear Candles,and repeat myself time and time again, (often my name is the only one being bitched about personally), i myself, rarely mention names, but apparently I am fair game for all that disagree, you readily include my name in threads and replies as if you have a right to be so familiar.
This site started off as THENAILGEEK and to be quite honest, sometimes it feels like the professionalism is being diluted.
I'm not the only one who has noticed
The literature and proof is in on Ear Candles, yet the profiteers continue to gain from the gullible (if a Nail Product were banned in certain countries, you'd listen), yet Ear Candles seem to be different. Why is this ?
Find me a link that proves the Candling process that isn't some bollocks from a supplier or distributor?
AS you may guess by now I am as strongly opposed to Ear Candling as I am to nail prep with a 100 grit file, or should I jump the fence merely for profit? (would you do it) ?
Many clients that have been prepped with a 100 grit file say their nails stick better, but does that make it a better procedure? (even Sam backed this comment up) .....
But is it good?, Is it professional ? Better still ....... do you care?