Aleks Sowinska
Member
Hi,
I'd like to hear some opinions on why people don't use hard/film wax on larger areas such as legs/arms (stripless)?
I know that it's probably slightly less cost effective, as it will be using more wax which is more expensive, however other than that the benefits seem to outweigh the one con I can think of - it's easier, less ingrown hairs etc etc.
It may also take slightly longer, however I could imagine I would rather give my client an extra 5 mins for a better service.
Opinions welcome
I'd like to hear some opinions on why people don't use hard/film wax on larger areas such as legs/arms (stripless)?
I know that it's probably slightly less cost effective, as it will be using more wax which is more expensive, however other than that the benefits seem to outweigh the one con I can think of - it's easier, less ingrown hairs etc etc.
It may also take slightly longer, however I could imagine I would rather give my client an extra 5 mins for a better service.
Opinions welcome