squidgernetball
Ubergeek
All I can say is "Why would you.....?"
Vicki x
Vicki x
All I can say is "Why would you.....?"
Vicki x
In a word Yes.So does this mean all teeth whitening people are acting illegally if they aren't a trained dentist, nurse or hygienist?
That's scary as there's so many around my area!!
- [FONT="]Selling a disposable gum-shield that is prefilled with non peroxide gel. [/FONT]
- [FONT="]The customer upon purchase of the gum-shield has the option of using this product at home at their own leisure or at our premises.[/FONT]
- [FONT="]There is no prior examination of the customer’s mouth. No advice or diagnosis takes place and no recommendations are given.[/FONT]
[FONT="]This means the role of our own technicians and clients are effectively limited to that of an approved product vendor, and does not fall within the remit of Section 37 of the Dentists Act 1984 (as amended). [/FONT]
- [FONT="]All information with regards to the product is supplied by the product manufacturer; we act as a vendor. Thus we do not carry out any procedures involving the application of any product which would constitute treatment, advice or attendance.[/FONT]
So it's a retail product, that a person can do themselves at home, using the information/instructions supplied with the retail product.
How is that a professional service?! Its a little like a person going into a hairdressers to buy a retail box colour, which they then apply to their own head whilst the hairdresser sits about reading the instructions on the back of the box to them!!
It is NOT currently illegal for persons other than dentists to carry out teeth whitening. The Law on this matter is currently open to interpretation, and used in a bias manner to favour GDC members.
While the GDC claim that hundreds of complaints have been recieved about teeth whitening operations, these are on the whole, complaints generated by their own members to protect their monopoly in their geographical location.
From these 'Hundreds of Complaints' less than a handful of people have been prosecuted, and these prosecutions came about rightly so, in most cases, because of blatant misrepresentation, or use of illegal products, which I would like to add, are still being used by a lot of dentists today.
The GDC have a backlog of complaints about their own members which still are requiring investigation, they are not shouting that out to anyone are they?
God forbid, you are carrying out a teeth whitening service within all the strict guidelines set out, and your local dentist sees a drop in revenue. FACT: Dentists revenue has decreased dramatically over the last five years.
You will be sent a generic letter from the GDC threatening legal action. I have added below a couple of references if you are really interested in this subject. I strongly believe that dentists have an obligation to make it a priority to get their own house in order, practice withing the guidelines they set themselves and agreed to, before they can adopt the moral high ground.
If you are interested enough, read the following:
exploreb2b.com/articles/what-your-dentist-doesnt-want-you-to-know-about-teeth-whitening
This is a BBC Video you can watch:
bbc.co.uk/news/health-16529194
This is a copy of an email I received from a reputable Insurance company I spoke to last week:
[FONT="]SECURE LINE INSURANCE[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Copy of Email 05/03/2014[/FONT]
[FONT="] [/FONT]
[FONT="]Thanks for taking the time to chat earlier. Firstly let me assure you that as long as an individual follows strict guidelines they are able to offer teeth whitening services responsibly and legally. [/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]The individual must ensure they do not fall within the remit of dentistry as set out by Section 37 of the Dentists Act 1984 (as amended). What this means is, it is not only the peroxide levels in the gel that the individual must be aware of but also the way the services are offered.[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
[FONT="]What we advocate for our own clinics and clients are ensuring the services they offer are limited to the following:[/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
[FONT="]
[/FONT]
- [FONT="]Selling a disposable gum-shield that is prefilled with non peroxide gel. [/FONT]
- [FONT="]The customer upon purchase of the gum-shield has the option of using this product at home at their own leisure or at our premises.[/FONT]
- [FONT="]There is no prior examination of the customers mouth. No advice or diagnosis takes place and no recommendations are given.[/FONT]
[FONT="]This means the role of our own technicians and clients are effectively limited to that of an approved product vendor, and does not fall within the remit of Section 37 of the Dentists Act 1984 (as amended). [/FONT][FONT="][/FONT]
- [FONT="]All information with regards to the product is supplied by the product manufacturer; we act as a vendor. Thus we do not carry out any procedures involving the application of any product which would constitute treatment, advice or attendance.[/FONT]
[FONT="]
As always I look forward to your comments.
[/FONT]
After spending last night and this morning reading everything I can on the internet I feel so bad that I was offering teeth whitening and a fool that I believed them. I bought the Megawhite licence as well.
Looking back I should have been suspicious when their adverts say "completely legal teeth whitening"! Why would anyone say that! Can you imagine a dentist saying "completely legal fillings and crowns"!
Enter your email address to join: