Natm
Well-Known Member
I'm confused I thought matrix had two extra coverage range? What's the reflective range? It wasn't colour sync extra coverage?
Tomme lol yes simply is good, sometimes people like me need to know what and how it does it though it's a colour geek thing! x
I get the adding extra base etc... And really can see why some1 such as you would use that way of putting it, but a rep who says just do the 50 thing and forget dream age is a strange thing to me, all reps iv seen have been willing to do almost anything to sell the products. Might go take look at dream age next time in at the warehouse, will make my life a lot easyer than intermixing xoxo
I'm not sure about the previous post about getting the exact same result as DA-5M by mixing equal amounts of 505G and 5M. I agree that it will cover the grey hair but the base colour will be different and not really give the exact same result. It will give an approximation though, I suppose it would be a 506GM or something like that.
Let me explain my reasoning behind 505G as the colour to mix with.
5M is a base 5 colour with red/violet reflects. It also contains green/blue tones to counteract the natural underlying pigment at level 5 (of which there are none in white hair). Therefore 5M applied to white hair would produce an undesired drab result with a deep violet cast: like mud with ribena thrown in.
You could mix it with 505N to help cover, but 505N is simply 5N with added ash tone and zero green. I've already demonstrated that the green/blue already present in 5M causes problems with white hair, so obviously adding more blue alone would simply make the colour darker and more violet than expected (It would look more like 4V than 5M).
What's the opposite of violet? Gold.
That's why you would mix 505G with 5M to achieve a 5M result on white hair. If you used 505N you would end up too dark and too violet.
...
This is what I mean by Dream.Age being the like a supermarket ready meal for those who can't cook. For people who cannot work out the above it's ideal. One tube 'seems' to do it all.
But for people who can work out the above when formulating for colour, Dream.Age seems very limiting. It's only one step away from a box colour in all reality. You pick the shade and apply it safe in the knowledge you'll get it. But what about personalising colour for our clients skintone, lifestyle, eyes, make-up?
I guess that's why some salons and hairdressers are turning out £170 colour bills while their competitiors can't even get £50 for the same service. I think clients know when you're formulating just for them and when you're mixing from a shade chart. Just my opinion.
Enter your email address to join: