blossom
Well-Known Member
I have been doing some research prior to my Minx training next week . .. . so excited about it, I can tell you!!
I'm finding that a lot of people charge more for Minx on toes than on fingers. Why would this be? (Maybe when I start Minxing I will find out lol :lol
Most fingernails I see are larger than toes and would therefore use more product? They are also more likely, in my experience, to be curvy, so require a bit more faffing to get the Minx looking good and so may take more time? The only advantage I can see at the moment of doing fingers is that you don't have to crawl around on the floor.
Toes are flatter, smaller and require less product. Why, then, charge more?
A thought has just occurred whilst typing. . . is it because they last longer?
(Talking of which, I've read that a Shellac layer helps Minx last longer - how much longer are we talking?)
thanks in advance for the replies xx
I'm finding that a lot of people charge more for Minx on toes than on fingers. Why would this be? (Maybe when I start Minxing I will find out lol :lol
Most fingernails I see are larger than toes and would therefore use more product? They are also more likely, in my experience, to be curvy, so require a bit more faffing to get the Minx looking good and so may take more time? The only advantage I can see at the moment of doing fingers is that you don't have to crawl around on the floor.
Toes are flatter, smaller and require less product. Why, then, charge more?
A thought has just occurred whilst typing. . . is it because they last longer?
(Talking of which, I've read that a Shellac layer helps Minx last longer - how much longer are we talking?)
thanks in advance for the replies xx