Beauti-listics
Well-Known Member
I think it is more useful and educational for people to actually read the Health Protection Agency report rather than this dumbed down selective article from The Sun.
HPA - Fish pedicures unlikely to cause infection
The HPA report The Suns refers to is actually headed:
"Fish pedicures unlikely to cause infection"
I have no axe to grind on this one. As I said, I wouldn't have one of these treatments personally and I don't have them in my salon. But I do pity the salons that have invested in the treatment and will lose money because of this sensationalised article. Must have been a slow news day.
I am with you on this juicy lucy.
Has anybody read No 20 habia news?
habia are working with HPA to develop and disseminate guidance on fish pedicures.
14 states have banned in the USA have banned it.
In the Uk the RSPCA has expressed concerns of the welfare of the fish.
However HPA and HPA Scotland have downplayed the risk associated with the treatment, and have stated that they are currently unaware of any cases of infection associated with the use of Garra Rufa Fish in fish pedis in the UK.
Personally i didnt like the one i had, it removed no dead skin and they didnt file and paint my toes!