Colour correction and college

SalonGeek

Help Support SalonGeek:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
It's a bit disheartening to read these stories of poor training in the UK. I went to college in North Carolina, USA, and I am licenced as a Cosmetologist there. The training I did there is equivalent to NVQ Level 3.

My college was apparently very strict, compared to some of these stories. Most days, our practical classes were from 08:00 to 14:30. We had to attend class on Saturdays, no exception. We stopped accepting clients at 12:15. Before we started working on live clients, we had to do 300 clock hours of theory and mannequin work. Basically teaching us the very basics like the basic haircuts, basic colour application, etc. All clients were walk-in, with no appointments. We did not choose what we were doing. Clients were assigned to us. A list of students was kept at reception, and as a client came in, they would be assigned to the next student on the list. We couldn't refuse to do a client - if we did, we got sent home. We had about one teacher for every 15 students. Most days, they were kept VERY busy with all our questions and requests for help. In every practical class, one student had to man the 'dispensary' and check-out products to other students, and another had to assist on reception. We were assigned a permanent station each semester, and we had to keep it clean and tidy. Our kit remained at the college for the duration of the semester.

Most of our colour services could have been classified as colour correction...haha. I used bleach baths, and colour stripper on different occasions. We did spend a good amount of time on colour theory.

We provided chemical straightening as a client service, and I did it a couple of times. We also did ethnic haircare, such as relaxers and soft curl perms (Jheri curl).

Smoking was banned campus-wide, and the only place you could smoke was in your car, no exceptions. Obviously that wouldn't work too well in England with so many students who take public transport, and the lack of student parking at so many colleges. I think colleges should have a designated smoking area out of sight of clients, and clients definitely should not be forced to walk past students/tutors smoking.

We were allowed two ten minute breaks, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. These weren't guaranteed; we could take them only if we didn't have a client. We did have to take a 30 minute lunch, though. They were very strict on absences. The number of days you could miss did change throughout my time at college. At first it was five days, then it dropped to one, and then went to two. In excess of that, without a very good excuse (basically extreme illness like surgery, a death in the family, etc.), and you got kicked out and would have to repeat that semester. We had to clock in and out whenever we entered/left the building. If we were over fifteen minutes late, it was counted as a 'tardy', and three of these would equal an absence. If we were over something like 45 minutes late, we had to go home.

State board (cosmetology is overseen by a regulatory board in every state in the USA. They licence cosmetologists and salons, conduct inspections and make the rules) would visit us about once a salon. The woman would inspect the entire place, including our kits and then give the place a sanitation grade which had to be displayed to the public. If she found our kit to be dirty (dirty = one hair in the kit), we got sent home, or lost points off our grade.

To get a Cosmetology licence in most states in the USA, you have to attend school for a certain number of hours (1500 in North Carolina) and then take a practical exam and a written exam. North Carolina also requires you to complete a certain number of 'performances', which have to be signed off by your tutor. This includes, on live clients, 75 haircuts, 100 hairstyles, 30 haircolour applications, 15 chemical reformations (perms, relaxer, chemical straightening), 10 facials, 15 manicures/pedicures, and so on, though we always ended up doing more of everything in the end. The exam is kind of scary - they're VERY strict on sanitation. You have to score 75% on both exams to pass. I scored 92% on the practical, and 94% on the written. The practical involved, on a mannequin, thermal curling, a uniform layer haircut, a blow-dry, perming pin curling, lightener/colour application, relaxer application, a facial, and a manicure. Most of these weren't 'complete services' - for example, with the perming, we only wrapped from the crown to the nape. All of the chemicals were simulated - water mixed with conditioner for perm solution, hair cholesterol for colour/relaxer and facial cleaner and moisturiser, and so on.

I definitely feel the training I got in the USA was very good. I have backed up my college training with my own studying and research. I can do the basic haircuts, and more, but I do need to work on my speed. I don't think hairdressing is a career to be taken lightly. It requires a lot of knowledge and effort, if you want to be truly good at it. I definitely do not ever want to be labelled as a 'cookie cutter' hairdresser!

Sorry for the long (and probably boring) post!
 
The girl we trade tested refused to trade test as she had only done 4 haircuts! You would expect to be able to give your junior stylist basic hair cuts on the shop floor..is that asking too much?
I was actually on the shop floor before I qualified. This was due to my willingness to get stuck in. I'd ask the other staff if I could do there hair after work in my own time and most importantly you would never find messy out back playing on my phone like many apprentices. I was on the shop floor watching every cut my boss did and taking time to ask questions.


hiya, i am currently doing my level 3. i specialise in doing colour, and i am on the salon floor with stylists asking me for advice in the salon!! i feel the same looking at some things people ask on here that are meant to be more qualified than me! my colours are always perfect and knowledge is second to none. however when it comes to cutting i am a stuck beetle lol. i can do all the basic cuts fine, uni layer, long grad, short grad one length etc, however i do need more work on my cutting. but ive been told that my standards in cutting are fine anyway and its just a confidence issue in my cutting and timing.

im like you though i put my life into my career and last year before i started my level 3 i was offered a job as a colour technician at toni and guy and then offered a job as a senior colour technician as my boss to be felt my knowledge and application was so good,

to be honest with you i am absolutly shocked at some "junior stylists" that i go to college with. incompetent, lazy, and no knowledge at all. i think it really does depend on the person, the education they have been given and most important, their passion.
 
wow its amazing how different the requirements are in the U.S! 75 cuts!

Perhaps these are the standards we should be requiring in the U.k?

Sent from my GT-I9000 using SalonGeek
 
hiya, i am currently doing my level 3. i specialise in doing colour, and i am on the salon floor with stylists asking me for advice in the salon!! i feel the same looking at some things people ask on here that are meant to be more qualified than me! my colours are always perfect and knowledge is second to none. however when it comes to cutting i am a stuck beetle lol. i can do all the basic cuts fine, uni layer, long grad, short grad one length etc, however i do need more work on my cutting. but ive been told that my standards in cutting are fine anyway and its just a confidence issue in my cutting and timing.

im like you though i put my life into my career and last year before i started my level 3 i was offered a job as a colour technician at toni and guy and then offered a job as a senior colour technician as my boss to be felt my knowledge and application was so good,

to be honest with you i am absolutly shocked at some "junior stylists" that i go to college with. incompetent, lazy, and no knowledge at all. i think it really does depend on the person, the education they have been given and most important, their passion.


I do hope you turned Toni & guy down!
 
I do hope you turned Toni & guy down!

i did yeah. this wasnt the same salon that offered me senior technician though, i was just going to be a normal technician at t&g.
toni and guy offered me a wage. then changed the rate of pay. so i declined.

the other place i was going to work was being set up by a guy who had been with t&g for nearly 20 years. he offered me to be senior technician. glad things didnt carry on with that though cos the poor guy committed suicide a year later and now the salon is shut down not even a year old.
 
i did yeah. this wasnt the same salon that offered me senior technician though, i was just going to be a normal technician at t&g.
toni and guy offered me a wage. then changed the rate of pay. so i declined.

the other place i was going to work was being set up by a guy who had been with t&g for nearly 20 years. he offered me to be senior technician. glad things didnt carry on with that though cos the poor guy committed suicide a year later and now the salon is shut down not even a year old.


All in Birmingham?
 
JuZz' But if class numbers were smaller there would be fewer people passing which reduces the funding they get for each qualifier they have. Xoxo[/quote said:
Hmm, I guess funding does play a major part but this also means that slackers are being classed as qualified hairdressers when they should actually walk away a failure? I know a few that qualified over my years that really didn't deserve too... If there was less students though, less funding would be needed, right? xxx
 
All in Birmingham?

t&g in malta. other salon was in birmingham, sutton coldfield, was called love. there has been newspaper articles about what happened and everything. his name was simon pritchard. lovely bloke. shame what happened. committed suicide two days after his twin daughters were born. he won midlands hairdresser of the year. cant remember which year it was though.
 
[QUOTE=JuZz'
Yes that's right, some places get students to a bare minimum level that they can class as "competent".
You officially only have to do 3 of the specific cut, nothing saying that all 3 have to be in succession to show you are at a standard that your work is consistent.

Less funding would mean less money to pay the tutors, keep the building in repair, stock the salons, decorating costs, Internet access, office supplies that are used, employers insurance, public liability, student insurance, buildings insurance, gas, electric, water, council tax, rent or mortgage, phone.
And without the above there would be no college. Sad to have to say, but these time wasters play their part in keeping the uk education system free for school leavers and low priced for above. Xoxo
 
Unfortunately nowadays it's all down to the fact of, the tutors/colleges get paid per student they pass! Soo.. Why bother to teach 5 students correctly and get amazing hairdressers but smaller wages when you can teach 35 students how to do the basics, get a higher wage and they then either teach them self more techniques or pay for private courses or just never do anything with their career again!
 
This is something i feel very strongly about, if anyone asks my advice about their/daughter/son going into the hair industry, i always reccomend finding a very good salon that does apprentiship.
As i feel the only way to learn is by being in a hairdressing environment, as with college they learn the very basics but have no idea how a salon floor is run.
I was very fortunate as i worked within a hair company and did my levels 2 and 3.
yes extremely hard work 40+ hoursand paid £45 per week, but what you learn is priceless. As part of our modules we also had to cover level 2 customer service and salon etiquette, which I think should be compulsary as so many stylists out of college have no idea on customer service or care.
 
I can't fault my college for teaching colour to be honest.

Our tutor has done her masters with wella and we have covered most of colour as a whole already? Definitely the bare basics of it all.

I also read some of the posts on here & think to myself- I'm only on my level 2 yet I have been taught how to do that or how to correct that.

Xx
 

Latest posts

Back
Top