Gel and acrylic offer two different solutions depending on the need of the client. If a client has hard, brittle nails they will benefit from the flexibility that gel provides. If however they have soft, bendy nails then the choice would be acrylic.In your opinion - which is a better extension? Gel or acrylic? And why?
Which is easier? Which do you think the client prefers?
Is there flexibility nail art wise?
Neither gel nor acrylic are 'easy' to learn but with excellent training and products, followed by lots of practice and determination application should not be difficult.
As a nail technician it is our job to advise the client on what product will suit their nails best, so although you have to respect client choice they will generally follow expert advice.
Nail art can be applied just as easy and with equal results to either product.
Are gel extensions harder to soak off than acrylic?
Which lasts longer?
Thanks
Gel generally requires buffing off whereas acrylic can be buffed and then soaked off. Depending on the quality of the gel this can vary in the length of time it takes.
- Gel Nails are much more natural looking than Acrylic.
With top quality products and expert application it would be very difficult to be able to tell the difference visually.
- Acrylics have a stong odour, and you as the nail tech have to deal with it. Low odour acrylics are readily available on the market.
- Also, Pregnant woman are advised against having Acrylic nails due to acrylic being toxic.
This is simply untrue - there is no scientific or medical reason that a pregnant woman should not be able to enjoy beautiful nails with either gel or acrylic.
- Acrylics are more prone to damage as they are extremely inflexible.
If they are applied to the correct type of nail ie soft, bendy nails, then this is untrue. This is where having a full, scientific understanding of your product helps us make the right choices for our clients.
- They require more fill in's than Gel nails.
Infills are determined by the rate of growth of the natural nail, NOT the product applied.
- Gels have a great glossy finish to them.
Acrylics applied and finished correctly, by buffing through the grits, a high mirror like shine is easy to achieve. They can also be finished with a gel top coat with the same result.
- Gels dry quicker and are less hazardous and easier to apply.
Acrylic is dry as soon as the curing process begins, which is why we can file and buff them - if they were wet we wouldn't be able to do that.
I do apologise for correcting your entire post above but it is full of inaccurate information. It is important for others reading this site that the information they are reading is scientifically correct. I would recommend you read Doug Schoon's book which explains all the knowledge a nail technician should need in order to know their products and be able to advise their clients correctly.
To the OP - there are now so many different options available to us and our clients that it can be very confusing when starting out. But if you are looking to provide nail enhancements, as opposed to a gel/power polish then there are some very good brands which you can start looking into.
I personally use CND, but other respected companies include NSI, OPI, IBD, Youngs Nails amongst others. It might be better (and you will get accurate information) if you contact some of these companies who can then provide you details of products, costs and training.
I think it is also important to add that providing the correct application method is used then neither gel nor acrylic are damaging to the natural nail, damage is caused by the technician not the product.
Good luck with your search!
Last edited: