Beauty therapist qualifications?

SalonGeek

Help Support SalonGeek:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The title Beauty Therapist definitely refers to someone who has a formally recognised qualification (NVQs, HND) in Beauty Therapy or Cosmetology. Have you studied & qualified in formally recognised Anatomy & Physiology and Body Massage units? These are core 'therapist' subjects.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I did nvq a n p during my aromatherapy qualification. Besides 5 years of a n p when qualifying as an osteopath so yep I felt justified in skipping the nvq beauty. I did shoet courses but with reputablw trainers auch as ah francis and sweet squared who ensure that the therapist is competent in the trwatew before dishing out a cert.
I will be opening a salon this year and wont be blinkered enough to only taje on those with an nvq in beauty but tuoae qho had done a n p another, more comprehensive route

Sent from my GT-I9100 using SalonGeek
 
At the end of the day aren't we really all debating words? Beautician or beauty therapist? And does it matter.

I say "fingers up" to anyone who wants to call me a beautician, actually, I'm claiming the term "Beautologist" as my own, so there...!!
 
At the end of the day aren't we really all debating words? Beautician or beauty therapist? And does it matter.

I say "fingers up" to anyone who wants to call me a beautician, actually, I'm claiming the term "Beautologist" as my own, so there...!!


Hahahaha love this :)


Sent from my GT-I9100 using SalonGeek
 
thanks for all you replies, all very interesting:) i think most in agreement that short courses dont make you a therapist, I studied hairdressing and beauty therapy for three years on a full time course including all body treatments and epilation, so would have considered myself fully qualified beauty therapist, however when i was due to take my final exam ( all in one day in those days) i was eight months pregnant and decided on the easier IHBC. so realise although i studied all these subject i am not fully qualifed as a therapist, but my friend who has done the alan howard coursed thinks she is!! just wanted my point proved right :)
 
I'm not sure the method of training necessarily tells how GOOD a therapist is at performing treatments. However it does tell certain other things:

I have taught on NVQ, VRQ, VTCT, HND and Nat Dip courses, and I can tell you that these have a rigorous quality tracking process. They also have standardisation set at a national level. These things are simply not true of a one day course studied at a beauty wholesale shop - this is not a matter of debate, it is simply FACT.

When employing somebody you have an idea of the kind of training they have had through the NVQ system. Of course quality varies between colleges, lecturers etc., but you would have an idea of how long they had studied for, what was covered etc.

Employing somebody whose entire training consisted of short courses I would consider a risk. You have no way of knowing anything about the type of training they have had, I think we all know, just because it is accredited by an insurance company is no guarantee of anything.

The whole thing needs looked at, in my opinion. Greedy trainers willing to pass anybody who has the cash, greedy insurance companies who accredit training without giving a stuff how good it actually is, and the rest of us who pick up the pieces with butchered clients on a daily basis. Not to mention the poor people who are conned out of their money with the promise of being a 'therapist', wax one leg below the knee and away you go, here's your certificate!

These are of course only my opinions, I KNOW there are good trainers out there, providing an excellent service, and giving amazing training. However, the majority of short courses offered are substandard, unfortunately.

I've said it before, and I will say it again, if we do not work together to tighten this area up, raise standards, and try to stamp out this substandard and exploitative training, it will be taken out of our hands.

We will end up with a system of state regulation, as per the USA, and BELIEVE me, anyone with less than a nationally standardised qualification then will not have a look in at getting a license.

Rant over. That was quite a lot for a Tuesday morning!!

J

eeek a very valid post above! , am going to give my opinion on this one aswell! I think a NVQ/ITEC/VTCT level 2 at least should be mandatory along with seperate A & P.. no matter the opinions of the quality of NVQ or that a certificate doesnt make a better therapist. it does prove a certain amount of guided learning, dedication and that the person has reached a certain competent level...then you can choose to specialise ie. advanced waxing/nails/tanning/lashes etc etc..:irked:.. or go on to do level 3 and so on.

I think that if you have done level 3 A&P with massage and other courses such as aromatherapy you are certainly a holistic therapist, aromatherapy is very involved.

In Italy as some other places in Europe you have to do state recognised 2 years (1800 hours) then a further year more advanced or specialist treatments (900 hours) to be a beauty therapist (aesthetician) then you can specialise further. To be an erborista (the closest I can find to a holistic therapist) it is 2/3 year diploma course or degree. This is very intense and is studied in Uni, it covers all herbs, massage, aromatherapy amongst other things. a lot work in pharmacies, some cover more aromatherapy and massage.

I know am going to possibly get flack for this but I feel as mentioned above a license should be mandatory following state recognised training.

There is nothing wrong with studying your diplomas in parts or modules, not everyone can go and study full time. but make them the recognised ones with exams. both CIBTAC and ITEC do this and then units added together make up whole qualifications, I personally prefer this way as exams are externally verified and perhaps it seems unfair to some that you are not graded continuously and if you mess up on the day then you don't get passed, but that is my choice.

I think it will get regulated, I noticed a post on here regarding insurance and have to be honest and say this is reflective of the situation in the UK.
 
Just stumbled on this site and read this. Is no one here level 4 trained? What does that make me then? I am currently doing my beauty therapy level 5 ellie x
 
Just stumbled on this site and read this. Is no one here level 4 trained? What does that make me then? I am currently doing my beauty therapy level 5 ellie x

I am level 4 ITEC, there are lots of very well qualified therapists that I have spoken to on here. What are you studying? X
 
HND is equivalent to level 5..... HNC used to be a level 5 qualification, but is now level 4.

J
 
thanks for all you replies, all very interesting:) i think most in agreement that short courses dont make you a therapist, I studied hairdressing and beauty therapy for three years on a full time course including all body treatments and epilation, so would have considered myself fully qualified beauty therapist, however when i was due to take my final exam ( all in one day in those days) i was eight months pregnant and decided on the easier IHBC. so realise although i studied all these subject i am not fully qualifed as a therapist, but my friend who has done the alan howard coursed thinks she is!! just wanted my point proved right :)

I think you are right x
 
I've been a qualified Beauty Therapist nearly 24 years. I was always told that if you held a certificate in Anatomy, Physiology, Massage I.e(ITEC, CIBTEC etc) this would put you as a 'therapist'. If you did, mani,pedi, tinting and waxing only this qualified you as a 'beautician'.
I have always stuck by this as there are now a lot of people claiming to be Beauty Therapists who haven't done the correct 'therapy' side. And they are the ones who give us therapists who have studied at the high end a bad name!
 
HND is equivalent to level 5..... HNC used to be a level 5 qualification, but is now level 4.

J

Yes there is a lot more covered for the diploma than the certificate, is that correct? And more hours covered. I think it is highly commendable to achieve higher qualifications. it is lots of hard work and wish that it was understood that if you have done that then it can be disheartening if there are others who don't bother but think it is ok to use the same description, it doesn't really happen so much in other professions.
 
Just stumbled on this site and read this. Is no one here level 4 trained? What does that make me then? I am currently doing my beauty therapy level 5 ellie x
For sure it makes you an advanced therapist x
 
Yes there is a lot more covered for the diploma than the certificate, is that correct? And more hours covered. I think it is highly commendable to achieve higher qualifications. it is lots of hard work and wish that it was understood that if you have done that then it can be disheartening if there are others who don't bother but think it is ok to use the same description, it doesn't really happen so much in other professions.

The higher national system changed a couple of years ago. It used to be that HND and HNC were both level 5 qualifications, the difference being that certificate was 10 units, and diploma 16 - so in other words all the units were the same level, the only difference was how many you took.

It is a good bit more complicated now - certificate is level 4, and diploma level 5. Both are made up of combinations of different units at levels 3,4 and 5. These units must come to 120 credits for a certificate, or 240 for a diploma. To complicate things further, there are strict rules about how many units from each level are allowed to gain each qualification......

In my view the higher nationals are not the qualification they once were - they have removed all the practical beauty therapy, there are only holistic and spa units now in terms of practicals....a shame.

J
 
I'm unsure myself they keep changing all the levels :/ confusing :( ellie x
 
Suppose it doesn't matter anyway. Its not like your clients care or even know about the differing qualifications. A beauty therapist is just that too them. I just hope when HABIA launch the register in the summer my hard work actually pays off. Customer can then see who has the best qualifications. This some times does not mean there the best therapists though. There are girls on my course I would not let anywhere near my face because they have no industry experience. I would actually trust my apprentices at work with no qualifications but loads of experience more. ellie x
 
The higher national system changed a couple of years ago. It used to be that HND and HNC were both level 5 qualifications, the difference being that certificate was 10 units, and diploma 16 - so in other words all the units were the same level, the only difference was how many you took.

It is a good bit more complicated now - certificate is level 4, and diploma level 5. Both are made up of combinations of different units at levels 3,4 and 5. These units must come to 120 credits for a certificate, or 240 for a diploma. To complicate things further, there are strict rules about how many units from each level are allowed to gain each qualification......

In my view the higher nationals are not the qualification they once were - they have removed all the practical beauty therapy, there are only holistic and spa units now in terms of practicals....a shame.

J
Just a quick question, as you seem the person to ask :) do you know why the NVQ system is used in UK colleges more over the HNC/HND BTEC? And yes I agree things seem to have become rather confusing!
 
Quite agree Ellie with regards to a register but perhaps experience should be a larger part of the learning process then if that is the case with regards to your fellow students xx
 
Just a quick question, as you seem the person to ask :) do you know why the NVQ system is used in UK colleges more over the HNC/HND BTEC? And yes I agree things seem to have become rather confusing!

It is all to do with levels.....Anyone leaving school can study for an NVQ level 2 qualification, however with higher nationals being levels 4 and 5, they wouldn't be suitable for school leavers. So in other words, higher nationals are a 'step up' from level 3 qualifications. Entry requirements for higher nationals would be a level 3 qualification.

BTEC do also offer a national diploma, which is a 2 year course equivalent to NVQ2 and 3. It contains a lot more written work than the NVQs, I find that these students are better equipped for higher national study.

Hope that helps!
J
 
It is all to do with levels.....Anyone leaving school can study for an NVQ level 2 qualification, however with higher nationals being levels 4 and 5, they wouldn't be suitable for school leavers. So in other words, higher nationals are a 'step up' from level 3 qualifications. Entry requirements for higher nationals would be a level 3 qualification.

BTEC do also offer a national diploma, which is a 2 year course equivalent to NVQ2 and 3. It contains a lot more written work than the NVQs, I find that these students are better equipped for higher national study.

Hope that helps!
J
Thank you J .Yes that explains it! Thanks again for taking the time to share your knowledge
 

Latest posts

Back
Top