NailsbyToni
Well-Known Member
Actually, no. When we use the term Shellac, we are referring to CND Shellac. It's a product.
Shellac isn't a gimmick. It's a product. One of many that CND have produced.
CND have trademarked and copywritten the word "shellac". Their shellac is a gel polish requiring UV lights to cure.
The definition of shellac: lac resin melted into thin flakes, used for making varnish. eg: any nail polish on the market; err, rather, any polish that is a good polish; not necessarily professional.
CND have a gimmick and it is called CND Shellac".
This isn't a bad thing. I'm just saying it IS a gimmick.
Exactly like Young Nails have a gimmick and his name is Greg Salo. They also have a gimmick in their brand of e-file, their brand of glitter acrylic, their brand of gel.
Tammy Taylor may be a human being, but she is also a product and a gimmick. Her gimmick is "Nail Diva". And she also has product lines that are gimmicks too.
Again, gimmick isn't necessarily a bad thing. But to say that ONLY CND is a shellac simply because that's what they call that particular product, is what's buying into the "gimmick". And misrepresenting what shellac actually is.
And yet again, *I* would use them if I could afford them. But, I wouldn't convince my clients that what they are getting is some special service that only CND can offer.
Not when I can and do, do the same things with the Gelish brand, or the ASP brand even (all other brands have a method to using their polish accurately. That's even a gimmick!)
Does that clear it up some? Again, I honestly (despite what I am saying) have no horse in this race. Truly! I just wanted to clarify my position here.
(and it's okay if we disagree!!!!!!!!)
Last edited: