I have used shampoo three for years .If my toner grabs too much. It removes it..
So according to you all shampoos do is remove gunk therefore why are we convincing 1000s of clients to buy our good quality ones over say 1 generic shampoo?
Also if course proctor and gamble are going to say that! How many people do you think avoid buying their products because they have heard they will strip their expensive colour??
If it was independent studies then I would think differently but it's rather like Benson And Hedges doing research on the affects of smoking lol
D
totally agree with you, i think its common knowledge that dependent on the type of shampoo you use will vary on tge amount of hair colour and lets not forget natural oils that are stripped from the hair, in cheaper brands and products especially otc ones vary in what is in the ingrediants, and certain ingrediants will speed up this process and also how acid or alkaline a product is and theres a great post on sg i read a while back on johnson baby shampoo and is infact very alkaline,
and some of those cheap brands i would suspect are not very kind to your hair for these reasons ,
of course it matters what shampoo you use and we all know from personal experiance etc that they do aid in stripping natural oils and colours from your hair!
and for a big company who sells most of the cheap brands is not going to change what we know
x
Sent from my GT-S5360 using SalonGeek
Do you think that 'expensive' or 'salon' shampoo contain better or more high quality ingrediants?
My colleague told me today that head and shoulders work with stripping colour out of hair?!
I've never heard of this? Does it work?
Head and shoulders does strip color. it also strips a layer of skin off the scalp.
The chemical ingredient in the shampoo is called Sodium Thioglycolate, it takes a layer of skin off the scalp (epidermis) to remove dandruff and flakes, hence being for dandruff suffers. So the chemical then strips the hair of color. The chemical is used in toilet bleach, oven cleaner, afro relaxing, perm solution ect..
Head and shoulders does strip color. it also strips a layer of skin off the scalp.
The chemical ingredient in the shampoo is called Sodium Thioglycolate, it takes a layer of skin off the scalp (epidermis) to remove dandruff and flakes, hence being for dandruff suffers. So the chemical then strips the hair of color. The chemical is used in toilet bleach, oven cleaner, afro relaxing, perm solution ect..
Head and shoulders does strip color. it also strips a layer of skin off the scalp.
The chemical ingredient in the shampoo is called Sodium Thioglycolate, it takes a layer of skin off the scalp (epidermis) to remove dandruff and flakes, hence being for dandruff suffers. So the chemical then strips the hair of color. The chemical is used in toilet bleach, oven cleaner, afro relaxing, perm solution ect..
The idea head and shoulders 'strips' colour is a hairdressing myth. The fact is that water is the only cause of colour fade during shampooing. Washing the hair with any shampoo will not fade the colour any more than just using plain water.
However some shampoos can help protect coloured hair, by essentially water-proofing the hair. So using a non-conditioning shampoo would be the best choice. Better still take up swimming and watch the colour drain away in no time.
Just wondering why sulphate free shampoos are supposed to be a lot kinder to the hair xx
I am quoting you because others have replied since then assuming that what you have said is fact.
It really tires me on here that people can come along (and I am not trying to single out your post in it's own, I have noticed scores of posts just like yours recently) and post with mis-information that frankly could be dangerous or misunderstood all wrapped up in a bit of scientific sounding nonsense.
What makes it even worse is that so many of the posters here are willing to believe it without even doing their own research.
Head & shoulders contains no such ingredient as Sodium Thioglycolate and I have no idea who told you that. Head and shoulders is a normal shampoo that contains an additive known as Pyrithione zinc. This additive is what does the job of clearing the scalp of excess dry skin. That's the only difference between dandruff relieving shampoos and regular shampoos. Pyrithone zinc is commonly used in professional shampoos too if they are designed to clear the scalp.
Please people, don't believe everything you read on Facebook or forums without checking out the facts yourself, especially before repeating those same statements as fact otherwise you risk making yourself look stupid infront of clients who know better.
If people are posting things as fact they really should reference where there is proof of the same otherwise it should be taken as hearsay.
Here's my evidence and well worth reading: Zinc pyrithione - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Meanwhile I will leave you with the following fact I discovered the other day - it turns out that if you colour a clients hair with any level red 6 it actually contains the blood of beetles - and you know it's true because I am telling you it is.
Stay safe and check your facts everyone!
Sodium Thioglycolate or Ammonium Hydroxide, is a harsh acidic chemical used in all pharmaceuticals for its abrasive nature. It is used in hair removal creams, toilet bleach and oven cleaner. In large %'s its very dangerous, but in small amounts it helps cleanse the hair, body or face.
It is one of the most commonly used household chemicals as it is a very souble substance in water and actually helps breakdown minerals, hence being used for cleaning or perming/relaxing. Its common name is 'caustic soda, or Lye'
Zinc Pyrithione is an actibacteral chemical ADDATIVE used in many medicated shampoos, it is commonly used in most anti dandfruff shampoos, to help keep the subactious gland under control and to stop the forming of bacteria on the scalp. The reason for this is, is when the scalpm flakes, new skin is visable and very suseptable to infection.
Another commonly used chemical is, Sodium Lauryl Sulfate. It is a detergent and this is what cleanses the hair. It is water based and the molceue had a water loving head and a oil loving tai. The head sticks to the water, and the tail to the oil, this is then able to be washed away, as water alone will not cleanse the hair.
I can not back up what I said about head and shoulders, so for that, geeks i aplogise profulsey. My reason for my statment was i have made shampoo, ive seen these chemcials and lots of others go into shampoos of all kinds, so from my knowdlege this is what was commonly used.
But I also feel you have contradicted yourself. 'Wikipedia' is not a reliable source of information, as it is a user based encyclopedia and holds no truth. As a user based website, a lot of it could be and will be un-factual and have no evidence to back it up.
So as for me just listening to everyone else. I think you need to look at yourself before making judgment, as my statement was based on my personal experience.
I would also like to add, that I found your statement to be harsh, rude and uncalled for.
Again geeks, I am truly sorry if I have mistaken you.
On the subject my friend did this trick she got off YouTube! I told her not to do anything like this but she did it anyway she got shampoo and crushed up vitamin c tablets and made a mixture put it on the hair and it did lift about a level of colour. She got me to feel her hair when I saw her and it felt fine. I didn't really know what to say to be honest as when she told me I was like,yeah as of that will work, but it did. Can someone please explain how it happened. I am no scientist and would never ever recomend a home remedy I want to know how it was done though. Science geeks!!?? Xx
Don't take it so personally - I did state that it wasn't your particular post I was attacking, but many like them.
I am glad though that you have realised there is no shampoo in the world that contains Thioglycolate in any form (unless you would like to introduce a new hair removing shampoo that is).
I understand Wikipedia is an online source that anyone can edit, but vs your clearly hazy and incorrect anecdotal memory as evidence it seems in this case it has been more reliable.
I would still encourage people to check their facts before posting something as 'true'.
Enter your email address to join: