number1kitty
Well-Known Member
In light of another baby being viciously attacked and killed in his own home only 7 years after a simialer case, and only today another two babies stabbed to death who do we blame?
I feel it a bit poor that the certain little boy in question happend to be seen so often and also was in a foster home a week before he died and still was not removed from his home.
I feel sorry for that little lad who suffered so much at the hands of his own mummy, someone who he trusted and loved. How can a parent torture their own child? Its such a shame more children die in the care of there parents than at the hands of strangers. Question is can it really be stopped?
Isn't it a scapegoat though accusing the social workers of negligence? These people are so good at covering everything and a child so young cannot speak out. Social workers have so many case loads to deal with and probably help save more children than the one or two that slip through the system every so often. No ones perfect and we can always make the wrong decision. After all we are only human!
The only people to blame are the parents and adults that have no conscience, who can hurt a little baby or young child for their own enjoyment. Weak people who pick on animals and children much smaller than them to make them feel good, because they probably would lose in a fight with people there own age!
I have a social worker to help with my eldest daughters problems and I cannot praise her high enough.
There are always good and bad people in jobs, and this case could be a case of purely bad judgement, or ignorance.
Whatever it was that little boy won't be brought back. The only people to blame are the sick people who beat him in the first place, and unfortunetly he isnt ever going to be the last!
Social Services will be blamed and people who probably already feel bad about the choices they made will lose their jobs. We must not forget though that these people are tied with red tape and often cannot just take a child into care. Unfortunetly they have to take into consideration the emotional effect that removing that child from their parents will have over the physical. Daft as it is, this is the law in place that often leaves these poor children in the homes that they were born in, to also die in too.
Who do you blame?
Kate
I feel it a bit poor that the certain little boy in question happend to be seen so often and also was in a foster home a week before he died and still was not removed from his home.
I feel sorry for that little lad who suffered so much at the hands of his own mummy, someone who he trusted and loved. How can a parent torture their own child? Its such a shame more children die in the care of there parents than at the hands of strangers. Question is can it really be stopped?
Isn't it a scapegoat though accusing the social workers of negligence? These people are so good at covering everything and a child so young cannot speak out. Social workers have so many case loads to deal with and probably help save more children than the one or two that slip through the system every so often. No ones perfect and we can always make the wrong decision. After all we are only human!
The only people to blame are the parents and adults that have no conscience, who can hurt a little baby or young child for their own enjoyment. Weak people who pick on animals and children much smaller than them to make them feel good, because they probably would lose in a fight with people there own age!
I have a social worker to help with my eldest daughters problems and I cannot praise her high enough.
There are always good and bad people in jobs, and this case could be a case of purely bad judgement, or ignorance.
Whatever it was that little boy won't be brought back. The only people to blame are the sick people who beat him in the first place, and unfortunetly he isnt ever going to be the last!
Social Services will be blamed and people who probably already feel bad about the choices they made will lose their jobs. We must not forget though that these people are tied with red tape and often cannot just take a child into care. Unfortunetly they have to take into consideration the emotional effect that removing that child from their parents will have over the physical. Daft as it is, this is the law in place that often leaves these poor children in the homes that they were born in, to also die in too.
Who do you blame?
Kate