jacqui
Well-Known Member
This may be a long post but please bear with me.
A while ago I went for an interview at a salon near me which included ongoing training; I thought it was a great opportunity. Anyway I spoke to one of the girls that works there just recently and she told me that she did all the training. She is Creative trained but not an educator and she trains all the new staff.
She began telling me that a couple of the girls had reduced their hours in the salon to rent rooms elsewhere; one of these girls went to the hair salon where I used to rent a room, she works there 2 days a week. She claims to be Creative trained and insured but surely she isnt, when she wasnt trained officially. I also found out that she has told the owner of the hair salon that she is insured through the salon where she works the other 3 days.
Can she be insured through the salon and rent a room elsewhere?
Can she really say she is Creative trained?
Another thing has been bothering me, a couple of girls that work in the shop next door to where I work go to a community centre once a week for free to learn to do enhancements, all they get is a certificate to say they had completed the course. One of them said she is going mobile when she is finished to make extra money. I told her she would have to be insured and with it not being an accredited course she wouldnt be able to, her answer was when I complete the course, I am qualified and I wont need insurance anyway
Is it just me that thinks this is just not right?
Can these girls really get away with it?
Am I totally wrong and this is allowed?
Im sorry if I offend anyone with any comments but I dont think its fair if they can do this, when most people go through the right channels for training, struggle to find jobs and they just walk into them.
A while ago I went for an interview at a salon near me which included ongoing training; I thought it was a great opportunity. Anyway I spoke to one of the girls that works there just recently and she told me that she did all the training. She is Creative trained but not an educator and she trains all the new staff.
She began telling me that a couple of the girls had reduced their hours in the salon to rent rooms elsewhere; one of these girls went to the hair salon where I used to rent a room, she works there 2 days a week. She claims to be Creative trained and insured but surely she isnt, when she wasnt trained officially. I also found out that she has told the owner of the hair salon that she is insured through the salon where she works the other 3 days.
Can she be insured through the salon and rent a room elsewhere?
Can she really say she is Creative trained?
Another thing has been bothering me, a couple of girls that work in the shop next door to where I work go to a community centre once a week for free to learn to do enhancements, all they get is a certificate to say they had completed the course. One of them said she is going mobile when she is finished to make extra money. I told her she would have to be insured and with it not being an accredited course she wouldnt be able to, her answer was when I complete the course, I am qualified and I wont need insurance anyway
Is it just me that thinks this is just not right?
Can these girls really get away with it?
Am I totally wrong and this is allowed?
Im sorry if I offend anyone with any comments but I dont think its fair if they can do this, when most people go through the right channels for training, struggle to find jobs and they just walk into them.