From Beauty to Aesthetics?!

SalonGeek

Help Support SalonGeek:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

YuMeSkin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Location
Hertfordshire
Hey ladies and gentlemen,

Have any of you changed career from beauty therapist to aesthetic therapist? If so, how to go about it if the therapist doesn't have any experience in aesthetic therapies?

Thank you :)
 
hi ,i know some of this has been done to death but after a discussion with a beauty therapist recently -she said that she was not now a beauty therapist but an aesthetician and knew more anat and phys than any doctor or nurse .As a nurse practitioner myself ,i found this quite disrespectful and would not do the same to other professionals however i am green here .so can it be clarified in beauty therapy -what extra qualifications ,if any ,it takes to become an aesthetician -thanks x
 
I would be interested to know what the difference is? theres a course called aesthetic treatments (cibtac) and its basically in NVQ language the level 2 course. I am confused about the "aesthetican "word, what does it mean? is it someone who concentrates on non-surgical treatments such as IPL?
 
To clarify .... I'm sorry for the person who said that she knows more A&P than .... I don't agree with that unless, she's done advanced courses on A&P but that still wouldn't be knowing more but maybe the same level.

Beauty Therapists do the usual treatments of non surgical machines, waxing, mani/pedi etc.
Aesthetic Therapists do chemical peels, derma rolling, non-injectable mesotherapy etc. It's more to do with the skin/facials and IPL hair removal.

The training in aesthetics is different for nurses and different for therapists.

Course Dates Innomed medical aesthetic training courses by professionals teaching non-surgical treatments botulinum toxin botox dermal fillers chemical peels mesotherapy advanced facial aesthetics Restylane Juvederm Ultra

This link would explain more. Therapists are attending aesthetic courses who are designed only for therapists. Nurses and Doctors have different training -----> different aesthetic courses, where chemical peels are highly concentrated and include derma fillers etc which I would never wanted to do and would always recommend my client to go to a nurse or a doctor to go for.

x
 
sorry just wanted to add ... nurses and doctors get medical training!!! Therapists shouldn't compare themselves to medical staff.
 
sorry just wanted to add ... nurses and doctors get medical training!!! Therapists shouldn't compare themselves to medical staff.

Nope, that's certainly true, but I have plenty of nurses and even dermatologists who have asked me for skincare advice. I suspect each has their own specialist knowledge, and there is probably much each could learn from the other.
 
sorry just wanted to add ... nurses and doctors get medical training!!! Therapists shouldn't compare themselves to medical staff.

Agreed!
 
I agree ... well, medical staff know abou the skin etc but not skin care routine. Everybody is pro at something :)
 
I think it depends - some therapists are extremely knowledgeable and do have more experience in certain areas so I would not necessarily say they are less informed. It depends in what disciplines the doctors and nurses are specialised in and why you would go to them as there are obviously boundaries between us all.

The aesthetician word has long been described to mean beauty therapy some older therapists may remember International Aestheticians a beauty therapy body. I feel the medical fraternity has taken the word aesthetics to somehow separate themselves from beauty therapy and that it somehow has a more scientific and serious implication! I think today's therapist cringes at the word beautician as it conjours up an airhead who is a bit thick and has no credible knowledge, so I can understand whilst the modern therapist terms themselves as an aethetician.

One thing is that now doctors and nurses see money to be made in this industry they no longer view it with the disdain that some have previously had and are eager to get a slice of the pie, so using this terminolgy creates confusion.
 
I think it depends - some therapists are extremely knowledgeable and do have more experience in certain areas so I would not necessarily say they are less informed. It depends in what disciplines the doctors and nurses are specialised in and why you would go to them as there are obviously boundaries between us all.

The aesthetician word has long been described to mean beauty therapy some older therapists may remember International Aestheticians a beauty therapy body. I feel the medical fraternity has taken the word aesthetics to somehow separate themselves from beauty therapy and that it somehow has a more scientific and serious implication! I think today's therapist cringes at the word beautician as it conjours up an airhead who is a bit thick and has no credible knowledge, so I can understand whilst the modern therapist terms themselves as an aethetician.

One thing is that now doctors and nurses see money to be made in this industry they no longer view it with the disdain that some have previously had and are eager to get a slice of the pie, so using this terminolgy creates confusion.

Essentia most of your posts unfortunately seem to demonstrate a very negative attitude towards us medical professionals, I am really not sure why, believe it or not the vast majority of us are extremely professional and actually care greatly about our patients. Suprise, suprise eh? Importantly, my FIRST consideration is not about the cost or income generated, but for my patients wellbeing and on many occasions do not treat - Yes, I turn away business! However, I make no apologies for charging for my services.

In terms of the word 'aesthetician' - actually the medical industry have campained AGAINST the use of this title to describe our speciality, because of the misleading nature. All sorts of individuals are using the word 'aesthetic practitioner', 'aesthetic therapist' etc which is indeed misleading to the general public, the vast majority of whom interpret to mean 'medically qualified' when as we know this is not true. So in fact as part of a consultation we have actively been seeking government legislation, and I would actually urge medical colleagues to steer away describing themselves as 'aestheticians' - in fact we are not.
 
Essentia most of your posts unfortunately seem to demonstrate a very negative attitude towards us medical professionals, I am really not sure why, believe it or not the vast majority of us are extremely professional and actually care greatly about our patients. Suprise, suprise eh? Importantly, my FIRST consideration is not about the cost or income generated, but for my patients wellbeing and on many occasions do not treat - Yes, I turn away business! However, I make no apologies for charging for my services.

Not at all - among my closest relatives are a nurse and a top London surgeon, I admire the medical profession very well indeed. I could well say the same about your posts in relation to BT. :eek: However there is no denying that some have jumped on the aesthetic bandwagon.

In terms of the word 'aesthetician' - actually the medical industry have campained AGAINST the use of this title to describe our speciality, because of the misleading nature. All sorts of individuals are using the word 'aesthetic practitioner', 'aesthetic therapist' etc which is indeed misleading to the general public, the vast majority of whom interpret to mean 'medically qualified' when as we know this is not true. So in fact as part of a consultation we have actively been seeking government legislation, and I would actually urge medical colleagues to steer away describing themselves as 'aestheticians' - in fact we are not.
I am glad to hear it.:D
 
One thing is that now doctors and nurses see money to be made in this industry they no longer view it with the disdain that some have previously had and are eager to get a slice of the pie.

"Admire the medical profession very well" - Slightly contradictory as above demonstrates. Sheer and utter arrogance and complete garbage on your part. :D

I would also add and reiterate (as I have done so on many occasions), I have respect for BT's, I employ BT's and have an excellent relationship with my colleagues, however we are completely different specialities and the two should not be blurred. :D
 
"Admire the medical profession very well" - Slightly contradictory as above demonstrates. Sheer and utter arrogance and complete garbage on your part. :D

I do admire most of the medical profession but some did/do jump on the bandwagon for financial gain

I would also add and reiterate (as I have done so on many occasions), I have respect for BT's, I employ BT's and have an excellent relationship with my colleagues, however we are completely different specialities and the two should not be blurred. :D

Good for you - but I note from the way you address some posts and indeed from your comments above, I do not feel there is a respect.:D
 
Essentia, maybe you could explain what you mean by your comments re doctors and nurses 'jumping on the aesthetic bandwagon' - how does that relate to cosmetic medical procedures?

And what do you hope to gain by publicly posting your obvious contempt for medical professionals by making such derogatory comments as to imply we are only in it for the money to make a fast buck and by then contradicting yourself?

I just really question why you feel the need to make such inflammatory comments, or do you think it clever. Very silly.
 
The OP asked if any went from a BT to aesthetic therapist. Some confusion has arisen with the terminology and what we today now believe these terms to imply.

I am glad that the term aesthetic practitioner is not encouraged to be intertwined with a medical practitioner as it indeed causes confusion.

I do not at all have any contempt for the medical profession (you really are over the top :confused:). There are many nurses/doctors selling their services as aesthetic services - I have been approached myself by GP's doing it alongside their day job and nurses wishing to use my beauty studio. Aesthetics is a term in my mind that is aligned to the beauty profession and I feel this may be marketed as such to integrate into salons etc because they know we have a target market (or possibly not but I suspect an aesthetic procedure sounds so much better than a medical one :D).

A lot of change has happened over the years - I have known doctors/nurses to laugh at my job but the tide has changed with many opting to do Botox courses etc, Doctor type skin products because there is money there. I do not condemn any for earning a buck but there has been winds of change since I started being a therapist in 83.
 
oh dear ,it seems to have opened a debate against clinicians v beauty therapists yet again.This was merely a question of clarity of the term aesthetician on my part as i was truly unsure. As a clinician myself ,I too have a fab team of beauty therapistsin my clinic whom i admire and respect their experience and expertise in their field and i believe vice versa.We need to maintain mutual respect for each others professions ,working together is paramount as our pathways often cross.However ,i have to agree we are different and need to remember that.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top