Following
Also following............
OMG.... I am all for a healthy debate but JMABEAUTY how dare you insinuate that the results I have been consistently getting for 18 months from Shrinking Violet are as a result of "holding the tape measure a little tighter". How unprofessional of you!!!!I noticed that they changed the claims, as the others have said above..I know what it is,and I know what it does not do, I can hold the tape measure a little tighter too😉😉
OMG.... I am all for a healthy debate but JMABEAUTY how dare you insinuate that the results I have been consistently getting for 18 months from Shrinking Violet are as a result of "holding the tape measure a little tighter". How unprofessional of you!!!!
You are within your rights to question the effectiveness of any product but please do not question my professionalism by suggesting I am in the business of lying to my clients. I'm quite sure what you have said is libellous!
Hi there everyone
I havnt used shrinking violet so unlike a lot of members on here I don't have experience of the results it delivers I'm not going to post about the treatments I preform myself but I have a lot of experience in product development and working as a consultant for skincare company's
Some of the points on here regarding transdermal penetration can be understood perhaps a little more by reading an article by dr hans lautensclager on nano particle ingredients in skincare he has a very clear way of explaining phospholipids and there roll in delivering transdermal actives
As far as transdermal products needing medical drug licensing this is only applicable if the actives being delivered are in fact classed as drugs for instance vasoconstrictors or opiates for pain relief
Thermogenesis ingredients are not regulated by the gmc either
Most of the companies I've worked for do not release clinical study report details only statistics of the results for topical skincare preparations ,only patented iso certified machinery such as lasers
I believe company's don't release this data because it leaves industry leaders open to copycat companies some details are company confidential that is not unusual at all
Unless your developing a unique raw active that is not yet on lab roles
Patent on skincare mixes is impossible
Cosmetics are exactly that and lots are extremely effective ,think about deodorant and how transdermal that is !!!! Still not a medical device
Deodorant isn't claiming to travel upto 5mm into the dermal layers of the skin, shrink fat cells and give permanent fat reduction!
Sorry but I don't have the time or energy to get drawn into this any further. All I will say is that before I take on ANY new product or treatments I fully research it and also try it myself. I have found SV to be a very effective treatment. In fact it is my busiest treatment with consistently good results.Oh good, so you've been using it on your clients for 18 months? Then you must know how it works. Could you please tell us as we're all jumping to conclusions. No one has given us an honest answer yet. All we seem to get is shouting.
Deodorant isn't claiming to travel upto 5mm into the dermal layers of the skin, shrink fat cells and give permanent fat reduction..
This is not meant to be an attack in any way...just a debate point....
I asked on another thread and was shot down....but being that the fat cells are between 3 & 5 mm down in the skin and anything that penetrates more than 0.5mm needs a medical license and therefor a medical qualified individual to apply it (usually with needles) I can't get it either.
Yes Lipolysis is a thing and yes the active ingredient is a real ingredient etc but being applied as an emulsified dilution it's got a long way to go to attach to any cells before affecting its metabolism and being "eliminated"
I also read I a interesting article about the "raisin" effect in fat cells being a symptom of a deficiency? But I can't find it now.
I found this interesting...
http://personalcaretruth.com/2012/07/penetration-of-cosmetic-ingredients/
And this ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transdermal
I for one need more proof before I offer it in the salon, too many questions. I base my transdermal knowledge on permanent make up and mesotherapy, and how the products are delivered and how they act in the skin due to their molecular size, who knows, maybe I'm wrong, but I need to know why....so just asking X
I did read your other post. I don't like dishonesty in the industry either. I don't make unrealistic claims about the products I use.
However, there must be an independent clinical trial because Moosebat has stated this several times. I would just like to see the results of this trial. Where was the trial held? How many participants took part? When was the trial? Which organisation did the trial? What were the results? Simple questions that should be easy to answer by someone who seems to know so much about the clinical trial. No point in banging on about a clinical trial if you have no evidence of it......we'll give you a chance right here Moosebat to prove us wrong.
I hope I'm wrong, because if I am, I'm going to the nearest salon who provides this treatment to sign up for a course of it.
With diet and exercise I could just wrap myself in cat poop and lose weight, or inches, or whatever you want to call it. In fact, cat poop might work better as it would certainly curb my appetite.
For me it's like this.
If you make claims, you must have evidence.
If you make public claims to sell a product, you must make your evidence public.
You must give people the opportunity to decide whether they are satisfied that the evidence backs up the claim.
Part of the issue here is that many therapists' grasp of the science involved is quite basic. Marketing departments are very slick, and provide product information that sounds plausible, but does not hold up to scientific scrutiny.
To this end I understand how many become brainwashed by product companies, not out of malice, but because they genuinely believe the claims. Of course, there are those who knowingly make false claims, and that is a whole different kettle of fish.
A good piece of advice was once given to me by my microbiology professor: 'remember, you don't know how much you don't know. '
Surely until independent, scientific and credible studies have been published, no claims should be made other than these wraps may make you feel good.
Inches lost does not necessarily equal fat destroyed as it could just be other fluid loss or the temporary effect of compression on the bodys soft tissues.
Medication (such as ibuprofen) can be self-administered or by a qualified health professional. If a beauty therapist was found to be administering medication then the authorities would make mincemeat of them.
If it seems too good to be true then it invariably is not true.
Common sense says if this actually worked it would be front page news the world over. Hospitals would not be performing very high risk gastric bypass surgeries they would be sending patients to the local beauty salon. Multimillionaires wouldnt be getting stainless steel rods poked into their butts to have the fat sucked out. Gyms would be deserted.
These things will probably end up on the same pile as those vibrating band things from the 80s that shook the fat off you! Along with those pills advertised in the back of FHM .if the claims made by them were true then I should be tripping over myself by now!
Enter your email address to join: