Eni
Well-Known Member
As some of you know, I trained in the 80's and am now contemplating getting back into the biz (btw: re: my earlier question regarding TT - looks like I'll have to take a refresher in Auckland once I get to NZ, thanx for all the responses)....
Anyway, read the whole five pages on well less tips....interesting to say the least. Haven't used them and don't intend to as I prefer the customisation available with the wells.
So here are the questions for the geeks assembled:
I have mentored with two techs.....one of them believes that once the natural nail gets to a certain point, a soak off is required, cut down the free edge and re tip and this makes the enhancement stronger. The other (whose theory is more like what I was taught) is to tip in the beginning, let the nail grow out underneath and then all future service is NNO.
Which method is most used, most preferable, most correct?
These same two techs also have differing ideas on product. I'm an L&P girl myself as we didn't really do "gels" in beauty school in the dark ages. It was there, but it wasn't really covered.
One tech believes that if you follow theory two, that you should transition the customer to gel for NNO. The other believes that you should continue with L&P for the strength but use a gel overcoat to seal the work.
thoughts?
I do know that *for me* L&P works best on my hands as they take one hell of a beating and the one set of gels I did get, didn't last very long. Could have been the application of the gel or could have been my own body chemistry, whatever. Thats just FYI information.
Any opinions, most appreciated.
Thank you!
Anyway, read the whole five pages on well less tips....interesting to say the least. Haven't used them and don't intend to as I prefer the customisation available with the wells.
So here are the questions for the geeks assembled:
I have mentored with two techs.....one of them believes that once the natural nail gets to a certain point, a soak off is required, cut down the free edge and re tip and this makes the enhancement stronger. The other (whose theory is more like what I was taught) is to tip in the beginning, let the nail grow out underneath and then all future service is NNO.
Which method is most used, most preferable, most correct?
These same two techs also have differing ideas on product. I'm an L&P girl myself as we didn't really do "gels" in beauty school in the dark ages. It was there, but it wasn't really covered.
One tech believes that if you follow theory two, that you should transition the customer to gel for NNO. The other believes that you should continue with L&P for the strength but use a gel overcoat to seal the work.
thoughts?
I do know that *for me* L&P works best on my hands as they take one hell of a beating and the one set of gels I did get, didn't last very long. Could have been the application of the gel or could have been my own body chemistry, whatever. Thats just FYI information.
Any opinions, most appreciated.
Thank you!