AngeFish
Member
Hi. I was wondering if you lovely Geeks have any advice for me? I have a prospective client who is really interested in having her nails Shellac'd as opposed to her Gel overlays which shes had for ages. These are done elsewhere.
However, she would like her nails Shellac'd as soon as Ive removed the overlay so I've been trying to do some research on whether this would be best practise. I'm concerned that after years of gel & visiting salons that drill file her nail plate they will be too thin initially. Should I remove them then make a decision on whether I Shellac, Shellac with fibreglass to reinforce, or if they are truely weak refuse treatment (but offer a normal mani) for afew weeks? Obv I don't want to put her off coming to me, but as I dont offer gel at the moment, it's not like I could pop another overlay on if they are too weak. I know Shellac isn't for everyone & if anything I've encouraged her to keep having the gel if that's what works for her but she so keen for me to Shellac her as I do lots of her friends & shes very taken with the product. Cant blame her .
Hope this make sense. Many thanks.
However, she would like her nails Shellac'd as soon as Ive removed the overlay so I've been trying to do some research on whether this would be best practise. I'm concerned that after years of gel & visiting salons that drill file her nail plate they will be too thin initially. Should I remove them then make a decision on whether I Shellac, Shellac with fibreglass to reinforce, or if they are truely weak refuse treatment (but offer a normal mani) for afew weeks? Obv I don't want to put her off coming to me, but as I dont offer gel at the moment, it's not like I could pop another overlay on if they are too weak. I know Shellac isn't for everyone & if anything I've encouraged her to keep having the gel if that's what works for her but she so keen for me to Shellac her as I do lots of her friends & shes very taken with the product. Cant blame her .
Hope this make sense. Many thanks.