-ack- Sorry... I mean BYOC means Bring your own Creative
The master classes are focused (obviously) on the Creative line. There is little benefit to be had by attending a course where you are shown to get the right mix ratio when whatever you are using has a completely different ratio.
I was just referring to the fact that no... You dont have to buy a kit in order to attend.
sorry, don't agree about the generic bit (am I allowed to disagree???). You can't win though, if you teach using a specific product line, then you are "accused" of pushing that line blah blah.
Of course you can disagree... our differing points of view are what make message boards like this actually interesting to read.
Here is why I disagree:
As mentioned above... if you go and take a 'generic' course on product application... how can you learn how to achieve the proper mix ratio? Mix ratios differ from company to company.
Tip compositions differ from company to company
Powder compositions differ from company to company.
Application techniques vary greatly from company to company.
There are areas in which generic education is beneficial... take natural nail anatomy. That doesnt differ from company to company.
My point is that if you try to level the playing field so that education is education regardless of the technology that makes up the system you use... you are bound to be at a deficit in the ability to maximize your performance with the product.
Product sales are what pay for education. Education is a lost money maker. Creative invests upwards of £1,000,000 a year into education but takes a mere fraction of that through course sales.
The whole purpose of the 'company led education' is that the sales can help buffer the cost of the courses so that many more can benefit from the classes themselves.
Sure... The thought is that if you are highly educated in the product line... you will have little need to buy any other companies product. But isnt that a small cost to pay? Seems an even trade off to me.
Look at US education for nail techs (uh-oh here we go again
) that is usually very generic. Almost every single nail tech out there that I have ever met in the US claim that they use little to no information they obtained from the schooling. Where did they get it then? From company sponsored educational events/classes/other techs they work with.
To me that says that:
There is a place for generic education (i.e. natural nail care)
There is a place for focused, product line driven courses.
When you try to be all things to all people, you end up being nothing to everybody.