What can actually go wrong with nail art causing a claim?
Severe allergic reactions could lead to a claim, but nail art on top of an enhancement or gel polish is hardly likely to cause that, it's the product that actually touches the nailplate or skin that would be the cause.
Therefore I could carry on as normal with my nail art certificates, and stick with ABT, but there is a principle here.
ABT recently said you had to have a certificate for IBX, and several people on here who had been using IBX posted that they would change insurers if that was the case as there was no actual training for IBX and any competent nail tech and gel polish trained therapist could easily do this treatment safely.
Then, when several people contacted them ABT retracted this, but all of a sudden a training course and qualification for IBX have now available! So will they change their mind again and insist you have to spend the £50 on this course?
When there are so many untrained unqualified and uninsured people out there undercutting us and cheapening our Industry, I feel doubly got at when Insurance companies take our money and and keep changing what they will and won't cover.
So ABT I'm scouting about for a new Insurer.