Hello all,
I've been reading the forum a bit now, but I need some feedback and advice as I don't really know anything about the industry
Here is the scenario:
After studying and qualifying from abroad, my friend has started work in a massage salon in London. A friend of hers, who has been in the business for a few years, suggested the salon to her. My friend works 11am to 7pm 4 days a week and is generally the only person there. She gets paid £15 / hour for a massage and a guarantee of £30 minimum a day. The charged rate is £50 / hour. So she could do 0 to 2 hours of massage and still get paid £30. Also she does other duties relevant to the day to day running of a salon.
How does this sound to you? Yesterday, the boss came in for a free massage, since she had no clients. The boss recommended that she is self-employed, with the idea of claiming for travel, expenses etc. Personally, I thought she would be better to be PAYE, although the boss would still be paying as above, but minus tax and NI.
This is her first massage job. So she feels that she has to be flexible to get into the industry. Is it normal for salon workers to be paid in this way? I feel that she should get paid for her role as receptionist too. £30 a day for 8 hours work doesn't seem worthwhile and without any employee benefits. Although I can understand in the current climate, owners would be struggling too with no customers and a premises to run.
I haven't really met the boss, but one woman has worked with him for 4 years so he can't be that bad. This woman also mentioned my friend would need a massage licence. From my limited research, isn't a licence required for a premises not an individual? Obviously, my friend would like private clients for home visits, would she need a licence then? The boss is suggesting he would put her name down on the next licence renewal. However, isn't that benefit only for the council the licence is held with?
What do people think? She is "self-employed" but treated as though she is employed, as she has to be there 11 to 7. Is this what somebody who wants to get into the industry has to go through to gain experience and hopefully get their own clients? Am I being too harsh, since she works 4 days a week and gets a minimum of £120 compared to £184 on the minimum wage? She would have to average 3 massages a day to get close to the minimum wage earned from 7 hours work a day.
Sorry for the long post. Thanks for reading and any replies.
I've been reading the forum a bit now, but I need some feedback and advice as I don't really know anything about the industry
Here is the scenario:
After studying and qualifying from abroad, my friend has started work in a massage salon in London. A friend of hers, who has been in the business for a few years, suggested the salon to her. My friend works 11am to 7pm 4 days a week and is generally the only person there. She gets paid £15 / hour for a massage and a guarantee of £30 minimum a day. The charged rate is £50 / hour. So she could do 0 to 2 hours of massage and still get paid £30. Also she does other duties relevant to the day to day running of a salon.
How does this sound to you? Yesterday, the boss came in for a free massage, since she had no clients. The boss recommended that she is self-employed, with the idea of claiming for travel, expenses etc. Personally, I thought she would be better to be PAYE, although the boss would still be paying as above, but minus tax and NI.
This is her first massage job. So she feels that she has to be flexible to get into the industry. Is it normal for salon workers to be paid in this way? I feel that she should get paid for her role as receptionist too. £30 a day for 8 hours work doesn't seem worthwhile and without any employee benefits. Although I can understand in the current climate, owners would be struggling too with no customers and a premises to run.
I haven't really met the boss, but one woman has worked with him for 4 years so he can't be that bad. This woman also mentioned my friend would need a massage licence. From my limited research, isn't a licence required for a premises not an individual? Obviously, my friend would like private clients for home visits, would she need a licence then? The boss is suggesting he would put her name down on the next licence renewal. However, isn't that benefit only for the council the licence is held with?
What do people think? She is "self-employed" but treated as though she is employed, as she has to be there 11 to 7. Is this what somebody who wants to get into the industry has to go through to gain experience and hopefully get their own clients? Am I being too harsh, since she works 4 days a week and gets a minimum of £120 compared to £184 on the minimum wage? She would have to average 3 massages a day to get close to the minimum wage earned from 7 hours work a day.
Sorry for the long post. Thanks for reading and any replies.