smooth
Well-Known Member
For a while now I have been posting on here regarding the fact that only dentists should carry out teeth whitening. There has been a growing number of geeks stating that it is not illegal and even companies posting on here offering training. I have been trying to prevent geeks from spending thousands on machines and training and to protect them from prosecution but there is one particular geek I can think of that continued to post and try to ridicule my comments referring back to so called legislation.
I have now found evidence to prove what I am saying is factual in that the GDC have successfully prosecuted people who are carrying out the dental procedure, teeth whitening, when they are not been registered with the GDC. Further legal cases are in process also.
I am posting this to prevent others from wasting their money, prevent them being prosecuted and to clarify the current position.
The following is extracted from one website regarding a non dental person who was sued and pleaded guilty to carrying out a dental procedure, namely teeth whitening:
The GDC has successfully prosecuted a non-registrant for performing tooth whitening, which the GDC regards as the practice of dentistry. On Wednesday at City of Westminster Magistrates Court in London 48 year old Paul William Hill of Warrington, Director of PW Healthcare Consulting Limited, pleaded guilty to four offences including practising dentistry while not registered as a dentist or dental care professional between 2 October 2010 and 11 March 2011. Under the Dentists Act 1984 it is an offence for non-registrants to practise or be prepared to practise dentistry.
The GDC launched the case last year after it received hundreds of complaints from members of the public and dental professionals about tooth whitening treatment being provided by individuals who are not registered dental professionals.
The GDC, which regulates all dental professionals in the UK, began criminal proceedings under the Dentists Act 1984 on the grounds that tooth whitening may only lawfully be provided by those who are registered dental professionals. Charges relating to two other people and one other company have been adjourned until 18 May.
So in light of this information any geeks that are undertaking teeth whitening or any geeks who have salons with non registered personnel carrying out teeth whitening what are your plans? Approach company for a refund, cease practicing or carry on regardless?
I have now found evidence to prove what I am saying is factual in that the GDC have successfully prosecuted people who are carrying out the dental procedure, teeth whitening, when they are not been registered with the GDC. Further legal cases are in process also.
I am posting this to prevent others from wasting their money, prevent them being prosecuted and to clarify the current position.
The following is extracted from one website regarding a non dental person who was sued and pleaded guilty to carrying out a dental procedure, namely teeth whitening:
The GDC has successfully prosecuted a non-registrant for performing tooth whitening, which the GDC regards as the practice of dentistry. On Wednesday at City of Westminster Magistrates Court in London 48 year old Paul William Hill of Warrington, Director of PW Healthcare Consulting Limited, pleaded guilty to four offences including practising dentistry while not registered as a dentist or dental care professional between 2 October 2010 and 11 March 2011. Under the Dentists Act 1984 it is an offence for non-registrants to practise or be prepared to practise dentistry.
The GDC launched the case last year after it received hundreds of complaints from members of the public and dental professionals about tooth whitening treatment being provided by individuals who are not registered dental professionals.
The GDC, which regulates all dental professionals in the UK, began criminal proceedings under the Dentists Act 1984 on the grounds that tooth whitening may only lawfully be provided by those who are registered dental professionals. Charges relating to two other people and one other company have been adjourned until 18 May.
So in light of this information any geeks that are undertaking teeth whitening or any geeks who have salons with non registered personnel carrying out teeth whitening what are your plans? Approach company for a refund, cease practicing or carry on regardless?