I'm not a nail geek but this thread caught my eye and I'm also glad that this has been raised (sorry in advance for the long post, but I thought it might help shed some light on the process from a training provider's point of view).
I only have experience of The Guild, BABTAC and Habia's approval process, but I can say that it certainly hasn't been a case of just sticking a cheque in the post and waiting for referrals to come rolling in. So far, all three have required (as a minimum) evidence of the following:
- Lesson plans
- Course notes, manuals and handouts
- Assessment strategies mapped to learning outcomes
- My teaching qualification (EDIT: actually, I just double-checked and Habia didn't ask for this, although The Guild and BABTAC both did)
- Insurance
- Proof of my own beauty-related qualifications (EDIT: again, this wasn't asked for by Habia but they did request confirmation of my insurance)
Other requirements have included information relating to training facilities, information about salon hygiene procedures (e.g. methods of sterilisation), evidence of training reviews, etc. In fact, one of the above three providers gave me a ring to check something they weren't clear on, so at least I know they actually read the material I sent in!
Habia endorsement also required me to map my course to the relevant National Occupational Standards (i.e. the framework that forms the basis of national vocational qualifications such as NVQs and SVQs; these are not the same as their Code of Practice guidelines which are still voluntary within the industry, although I certainly agree with Kim that we should be working to them anyway). I also have a visit next month from one of their staff to check that my course is up to scratch. I don't know whether these requirements apply to all of the CPD courses they approve and I'm certainly not saying that NVQ learning outcomes are the be-all and end-all, but it gave me confidence that they don't just hand out endorsements willy-nilly.
Of course, all of the above means diddly squat if the tutor can't teach the material effectively or doesn't have the necessary skills or experience in the subject they are teaching, and this is really where I think the current system falls short.
From my own experience, I do think that the recognition process relating to the above three providers puts a level of checking in place that goes a long way towards ensuring students are getting education that will meet their needs in the workplace, but maybe it needs to go further? I'm all for that, although I dread to think how much that would cost (incidentally, I'm with Kim 100% on the cost of recognition - I can absolutely see why there needs to be a charge, and individually the charges are pretty reasonable as each of the above providers will promote and cover more than one course under their initial fee, but it quickly adds up and to get my training recognised by every insurance provider out there would probably put me out of business within a year!).
Sorry for the length - waffle over
Andy x