There are several points I'd like to make. I hope you don't object Sandra? I think they may be useful for the Geeks on here. Especially after reading the posts. I would like to point out competition vs salon plus a general critique on the aesthetics.
1. This is a competition and 'impact' is important. However, in a salon situation I wouldn't recommend this type of enhancement.
2. The comment about changing brand in a post does not relate to the result. This result could be achieved with many (if not most) brands. It is the execution that matters.
3. In a salon environment, the nails are far too long. Just a couple of millimetres over the end of the finger is best suited to a nail biter.
4. Staying on for 5 weeks may appear to be good but 5 weeks is far too long to leave a nail biter (in general). 5 week old enhancements will not look good even if they are all still on. 1 week maintenance is the best situation for the first appointment.
5. For a more aesthetically pleasing nail, I would suggest a free edge that is narrower and a shape that mirrors the cuticle area rather than a wide, square shape.
6. The tip application shows that the bitten nail and slightly bulbous skin has been tailored to avoid the upward shape that so often happens when this type of nail is enhanced.
7. As I spend most of my working life doing nails for photography, I hate to see the skin flooded with oil! Oil is not allowed in most competitions as it hides so much. It is difficult to see how neat and even zone 3 is.
Again, congratulations for winning Sandra. I hope you understand why I want to point out to new technicians what salon enhancements should be. The last point is a personal comment but one that I believe to be relevant.