mum
Well-Known Member
Great thread Geeg!
As with any subject, there is no clear cut division.
The world has leant towards specialism in many areas for years and the divisions of specialisms are becoming more obvious as time goes on.
As small as the (physical) area of nails may be there is so much to know. A truly skilled specialist in nails can deal with and improve almost any condition. When Geeg speaks of 'nail enhancer' I think she is including natural nails as well as 'nail enhancements'. A true specialist in all this is a valuable 'comodity'.
I have always firmly believed in the 'stand alone' nail specialist (thanks Geeg for acknowledging this). I also truly believe any association of this profession is closer to the hair specialist than the beauty specialist.
An even stronger opinion of mine is that our industry is in the best position it's ever been in to grow and promote our professional individual status. Unfortunately, the industry itself is what is preventing this from happening.
The unclear demarcation of the specialists are not a problem in my opinion. There will always be those who are multi-skilled and, as long as those who include nail services treat them properly, and not an 'add-on' all will be fine.
Oceana's comment on uniform was misunderstood I think. My nail team do have a 'uniform'. It is professional but has individual style. To me, nail stylists are creative, they are not clinical beauticians. They need to fit in with the environment they work in, look professional but have a real creative appearance.
Hair stylists usually follow a salon code but are allowed their own style. To me, this reflects what a nail stylist should promote.
As Oceana said, we are not selling a dream; we are selling instant gratification but with long term improvement.
I hope, one day, the industry will collectively agree where our future success lies. I feel we are not there yet. Great threads like this can only help.
As with any subject, there is no clear cut division.
The world has leant towards specialism in many areas for years and the divisions of specialisms are becoming more obvious as time goes on.
As small as the (physical) area of nails may be there is so much to know. A truly skilled specialist in nails can deal with and improve almost any condition. When Geeg speaks of 'nail enhancer' I think she is including natural nails as well as 'nail enhancements'. A true specialist in all this is a valuable 'comodity'.
I have always firmly believed in the 'stand alone' nail specialist (thanks Geeg for acknowledging this). I also truly believe any association of this profession is closer to the hair specialist than the beauty specialist.
An even stronger opinion of mine is that our industry is in the best position it's ever been in to grow and promote our professional individual status. Unfortunately, the industry itself is what is preventing this from happening.
The unclear demarcation of the specialists are not a problem in my opinion. There will always be those who are multi-skilled and, as long as those who include nail services treat them properly, and not an 'add-on' all will be fine.
Oceana's comment on uniform was misunderstood I think. My nail team do have a 'uniform'. It is professional but has individual style. To me, nail stylists are creative, they are not clinical beauticians. They need to fit in with the environment they work in, look professional but have a real creative appearance.
Hair stylists usually follow a salon code but are allowed their own style. To me, this reflects what a nail stylist should promote.
As Oceana said, we are not selling a dream; we are selling instant gratification but with long term improvement.
I hope, one day, the industry will collectively agree where our future success lies. I feel we are not there yet. Great threads like this can only help.