Here is some food for thought?
Let's say that a client develops an allergic reaction to Shellac and decides to sue you ( ie, those who are not using the complete Shellac sysytem)
Am I right in thinking that you would be sued personally as oppsed to CND having to take the wrap , as you have not followed the procedure as set out by the company ???
Slightly off topic, but ....
I remember when I was pregnant, my lab manager at the time insisted that I should carry out a task that involved using a chemical that could possible cause deformities in foetus.
I refused to do the task while I was pregnant , so he took me to a disciplinary as he thought I was making a big deal out of nothing.
We ended up having to go in front of a panel that included a doctor and lawyer, who asked him why he wanted me to carry on doing this task.
His reasoning was that he knew of many women in other labs who had been pregnant and had carried out the same task, and nothing had happened to their children.
As soon as the Doctor and Lawyer explained that if my child was born with, say a heart defect, whether caused by the chemical or not, and I took him to court, he would not have a leg to stand on and he would be imprisoned, fined and or lose his job.
Needles to say , he left me alone after that !!
Let's say that a client develops an allergic reaction to Shellac and decides to sue you ( ie, those who are not using the complete Shellac sysytem)
Am I right in thinking that you would be sued personally as oppsed to CND having to take the wrap , as you have not followed the procedure as set out by the company ???
Slightly off topic, but ....
I remember when I was pregnant, my lab manager at the time insisted that I should carry out a task that involved using a chemical that could possible cause deformities in foetus.
I refused to do the task while I was pregnant , so he took me to a disciplinary as he thought I was making a big deal out of nothing.
We ended up having to go in front of a panel that included a doctor and lawyer, who asked him why he wanted me to carry on doing this task.
His reasoning was that he knew of many women in other labs who had been pregnant and had carried out the same task, and nothing had happened to their children.
As soon as the Doctor and Lawyer explained that if my child was born with, say a heart defect, whether caused by the chemical or not, and I took him to court, he would not have a leg to stand on and he would be imprisoned, fined and or lose his job.
Needles to say , he left me alone after that !!