Yes.....as an avid ponder I have used UV lights for years (as I said in my first post
) and the basic principal of UV light emissions does not change even though the applications may be different.
The point I was trying to get across.......(and really kind of shocked that it was so hard to get across) is that the CND 36 watt light is really not SIGNIFINCANTLY different from many 36 watt tunnel UV lamps that are currently on the market. And when other similiar UV lights are used to cure Shellac there should be a good outcome.
Over and over I read when someone has a problem that perhaps it is due to not using the CND lamp. Even accusations that if not using the proper CND lamp that the Shellac may be under cured and cause the client allergies. It seems someone heard and read it and then it keeps getting repeated. I want facts please.
Anyways.......I am glad I can think outside the box. I choose not to drink the Kool Aid. If someone says I MUST use something exlusively when there are other very similiar products at a much lower price I will want to know if the exlusive product is better. I will ask for proof. But that is what is great about being me. I also don't feel threatened or respond angrily when someone asks questions I don't like, or has a different opinion then I do. I really feel I have experienced the true culture of this forum. It seems agree with us or be attacked. I was never rude, or cocky and just asked for facts to back up claims. And the previous post just makes me understand that there are many people who cannot think outside the box at all (although I was impressed with one response in which the poster expressed herself in an articulate and nonjudgmental manner. I love poise.) BTW-
I actually like Shellac and CND has received a good chunk of change from me. God bless and have a great day.